‘Just Say No’ Republicans Sideline DREAM Act in Senate

Just hours after the historic House vote last night to pass the DREAM Act, the Senate voted today 59-40 to table consideration of the bill. This means the bill could come up again during the lame-duck session. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) said having a vote now to bring the bill to the floor was “futile” because there were not enough votes to overcome a  Republican filibuster against the bill. 

If you’re on Twitter, take a minute to retweet this:  RT @americasvoice BREAKING: Senate tables #DREAMAct in order to take up House bill. Call ur senators! 866-996-5161 #ri4a

The Senate version of the bill is different from the one passed by the Hiuse and the Senate may take the legislation up when it receives the House version as early as Monday.

During the debate on the bill, Sen. Richard Durbin (D-Ill.), the bill’s sponsor, said the nation cannot afford to lose the talents of the many talented immigrant children who will be helped by the DREAM Act.

We owe it to America who needs their service in the military and  needs their skill in building our economy [I ask the Senate] to pause to reflect whether we can afford to say to these talented young men and women there’s no place in America for you.

Sen. Robert Menendez (D-N.J.) said the DREAM Act is not amnesty for undocumented immigrants as opponents charge:

Amnesty is when you get something for nothing. I believe wearing the uniform of the United States of America, risking your life for your country, maybe losing that life…is not amnesty. I believe that working hard and being educated so you can help fuel the nation’s prosperity …that is paying your dues on behalf of the country.

The Development, Relief and Education for Alien Minors (DREAM) Act, which is supported by a large majority of Americans, would allow undocumented students who have lived in the United States for at least five years and have graduated from high school or received a graduate equivalency diploma (GED) to legalize their immigration status by pursuing a college education or serving in the U.S. military.

The House passed the bill last night 216-198. It was the first time in the 10-year legislative history of the DREAM Act that the House has passed the bill.

During the House debate, Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said:

Think of these young people and how they identify with America — they have no other identity in many cases. They want to use their degrees and their skills to help build something better for the next generation. That’s what our founders had in mind. We owe it to our founders and we owe it to these young people and we owe it to the future to cast our votes for a bill that makes America more American.

“Let’s give the DREAM kids an opportunity. They are American in every way but a piece of paper,” said Rep. Luis Gutierrez (D-Ill.).

We have come here to support the rule of law, yes, but to change the law when it is unfair.

President Obama praised the House vote in a statement:.

This vote is not only the right thing to do for a group of talented young people who seek to serve a country they know as their own by continuing their education or serving in the military, but it is the right thing for the United States of America.

Republicans Block Workers’ Rights, Social Security, Mine Safety Bills

  

Living up to its reputation as the party of “No,” Republican lawmakers yesterday blocked action on a Social Security cost of living supplement, stalled collective bargaining rights for public safety officers and stonewalled stronger mine safety laws. Republican leaders have vowed to halt all Senate action until the Bush-era tax cuts for the wealthy are brought to a vote.

But the House did pass the Dream Act, 218-198, and the Senate is scheduled to vote on the bill (S. 3992) today. We’ll keep you updated.  The Senate also is expected to vote on the 9/11 first responders health care bill (H.R. 847).

In the Senate, the Social Security (S. 3985) and the collective bargaining (S.3991) bills required 60 votes to end Republicans filibusters.

Seniors have gone two years in a row without a cost of living adjustment.  Alliance for Retired Americans Executive Director Edward C. Coyle says the vote (53-45) to deny the cost of living adjustment (COLA) was “height of callous hypocrisy.”

In a week defined by tax cuts for millionaires, retirees are stunned and outraged that Congress would reject a one-time $250 payment to seniors…This legislation is critical to retirees, but unfortunately, congressional Republicans overwhelmingly chose to oppose it.  While Democrats continue to protect Social Security, Republicans continue to advocate risky schemes to privatize it and cut benefits.  America’s seniors deserve better.

Not a single Republican broke ranks, but Sen. Joe Lieberman, (I-Conn.), and four Democrats voted to block the cost of living adjustment: Sen. Russ Feingold (Wis.), Sen. Mark Udall (Colo.), Sen. Kay Hagan (N.C.) and Sen. Mark Warner (Va.).

The collective bargaining bill would protect the freedom of firefighters and other public safety officers to join unions. More than 20 states do not fully protect those bargaining rights, and two states—Virginia and North Carolina—prohibit public safety employees from collectively bargaining

Fire Fighter (IAFF) Presidents Harold Schaitberger says “It’s a sad day in America when the rights of firefighters are ignored in favor of tax breaks for millionaires.”

The Senate is being deeply irresponsible. Failing to extend the collective bargaining rights that firefighters deserve because they can’t reach an agreement on tax breaks is shameful.

AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka says:

By standing in the way of the Public Safety Employer-Employee Cooperation Act, Republican senators are continuing to deny basic rights on the job to firefighters on the front lines who keep our communities safe.

The vote on the bill was 55-43 with Hagan, Warner and Sen. Michael Bennett (D-Colo.) joinimg Republicans to kill the bill.

The mine safety bill in the House won majority support, 214-193, but the bill was considered under a procedure called “suspension of the rules” which requires a two-thirds majority necessary to pass.

The bill (H.R. 6495) would have given the Mine Safety and Health Administration powerful new tools to keep miners safe and hold mine operators accountable for putting their workers in dangers.  Says Rep. George Miller (D-Calif.), chairman of the Education and Labor Committee:

I am deeply disappointed that Republicans turned their backs on those who work in mines every day, 600 of whom who have died in the last decade. As other mine tragedies have show us in the past, inaction today is paid for with the lives of hard-working miners tomorrow.

Workers Push Back on Move to Weaken Ohio Bargaining Law

Ohio political observers expect Gov. Elect John Kasich (R) and his Republican allies in the state legislature to take aim the Buckeye States’ 1984 law that protects collective bargaining rights for public employees.

Kasich attacked public employees during the campaign and Cleveland Plain Dealer columnist Brent Larkin writes:

Kasich and the Republican-run legislature might just propose changes to Ohio’s collective-bargaining laws that precipitate an epic fight with Democrats and their allies in organized labor.

But Andy Richards, Ohio AFL-CIO Field Communications staffer, says workers in Middletown last night won one of the first skirmishes in the battle to protect workers’ rights. He files this report.

More than 100 union members and their allies packed the Middletown City Council chambers to show strong opposition and speak out against a resolution calling on the state legislature to weaken the current collective bargaining law. The council voted 6 to 1 to table the resolution. After the meeting, Fire Fighters (IAFF) Local 336 President John Harvey said the council

took a strong stand tonight in support of our community and the middle class. As a proud fire fighter, I work hard everyday to provide the best services to residents in Middletown and Butler County.  This resolution would have put our services at risk by taking away a process that has provided stability and cooperation between workers and local, county and state government agencies.

Ohio AFL-CIO President Joe Rugola said “Ohioans and workers know this resolution would have been a step in the wrong direction for communities across the state.”

The collective bargaining law has helped to create a relationship between workers and public administrators that has fostered greater consistency and stability in delivery of services.

Push Is On to Pass DREAM Act

Breaking News: The House has passed the DREAM Act by a 216-198 margin. Eight Republicans voted for the bill and 38 Democrats voted against it.

As Congress prepared to vote on the DREAM Act today, thousands of students, immigrant activists, religious and political leaders are making a last-minute push to pass the bill.

Across the country, thousands of workers and activists held vigils in support of the bill as part of a national day of action. Yesterday, groups of DREAM Act youth and supporters arrived on Capitol Hill with giant checks for $2.3 billion to give out to lawmakers. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimated late last week that passing the DREAM Act would create $2.3 billion in revenue over the next 10 years and slash the deficit by $1.4 billion.

Take action now. Call your representative at 1-866-967-6018 or your senators at 1-866-996-5161 and tell them:

America needs the DREAM Act now. This bill will allow undocumented youths to earn their legal status through either a college education or military service. Additionally, the DREAM Act strengthens the U.S. economy by cutting the deficit by $1.4 billion.

The Center for American Progress also reported on a recent study by the UCLA North American Integration and Development Center, which showed the total earnings of DREAM Act beneficiaries over the course of their working lives would generate about $1.4 trillion to $3.6 trillion over a 40-year period.

The Development, Relief and Education for Alien Minors (DREAM) Act, which is supported by 66 percent of Americans, would allow undocumented students who have lived in the United States for at least five years and have graduated from high school or received a graduate equivalency diploma (GED) to legalize their immigration status by pursuing a college education or serving in the U.S. military.

In a statement, Janet Murguía, president of the National Council of La Raza, said today’s vote will have political significance:.

For Latinos, the fastest-growing segment of the nation’s electorate, the DREAM Act vote is a defining one.…The time for excuses is over. The DREAM Act has been around for over a decade and has been debated and supported by members of both parties. It is time for a vote, and no amount of excuses will hide which members chose to stand for innocent children, and which did not. And Latinos will remember exactly which side those members chose.

DREAM Act supporters, including the White House and cabinet members, are trying to win additional votes for the bill in the final hours before the votes. Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano and Education Secretary Arne Duncan spoke in support of the bill at the Capitol today and other cabinet members are making phone calls to undecided senators.

The White House Office of Management and the Budget issued a statement encouraging senators to vote for the bill, calling it an “important step” toward the administration’s broader goal of comprehensive immigration reform.

Michael Gerson, a former Bush aide, explained in the Washington Post that rather than debate the DREAM Act on its merits, many Republicans are practicing partisan politics rather than governing for the overall good.

The DREAM Act would be a potent incentive for assimilation. But for some, assimilation clearly is not the goal. They have no intention of sharing the honor of citizenship with anyone called illegal—even those who came as children, have grown up as neighbors and would be willing to give their lives in the nation’s cause.

Will Republicans Block Quartet of Working Family Bills?

UPDATE, 7:30 p.m. (EST)—The public safety officers collective bargaining bill (S. 3991) failed to win cloture (60 votes are needed) by a 55-43 vote, with threeDemocrats joining Republicans in blocking a vote on the bill. The three are Sen. Michael Bennett (D-Colo.), Sen. Kay Hagan (D-N.C.) and Sen. Mark Warner (D-Va.).  

Republicans also led the fight to defeat the $250 Social Security cost of living adjustment supplemental payment legislation (S. 3985). The motion to end the filibuster failed by a 53-45 vote. The four Democrats and Independent who voted to block the cost of living adjustment are Sen. Russ Feingold (Wisc.) Sen. Mark Udall (D-Colo.) Sen. Joe Lieberman, (I-Conn.), Hagan and Warner.

Four vital bills for working families are set for action in the U.S. Senate later today and this evening, but all four will need 60 votes to shut off  Republican filibusters.  Most Senate Republicans oppose the bills and Republican leaders have vowed to halt all Senate action until the Bush-era tax cuts for the wealthy are brought to a vote.

The bills scheduled for cloture votes today are:

The House passed the 9/11 health care bill 268 to 160 in September, with 13 Republican votes. But Senate action stalled amid reports that Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) was the major stumbling block.

The bill would provide long-term medical care and monitoring for the first responders, recovery workers and others exposed to the Ground Zero toxic mix of chemicals, jet fuel, asbestos, lead, glass fragments and other debris.

More than 13,000 World Trade Center responders are sick and receiving treatment. Nearly 53,000 responders are enrolled in medical monitoring. Some 71,000 are enrolled in the World Trade Center health registry, indicating that they were exposed to the toxins.

The collective bargaining bill—the Public Safety Employer-Employee Cooperation Act—protects the freedom of firefighters and other public safety officers to join unions.

More than 20 states do not fully protect those bargaining rights, and two states—Virginia and North Carolina—prohibit public safety employees from collectively bargaining.

The legislation guarantees first responders:

  • The right to join a union.
  • The right to have their union recognized by their employer.
  • The right to bargain collectively over hours, wages and terms and conditions of employment.
  • A fact-finding, mediation or arbitration process for resolving an impasse in negotiations.
  • Enforcement of these rights, and of written contracts, through state courts.

Today’s cloture votes, says Fire Fighters (IAFF) President Harold Schaitberger, will ensure all senators have a chance to:

to demonstrate publicly whether or not they stand with professional firefighters. It’s that simple.

The $250 Social Security supplemental payment in S. 3985 is designed to help offset the lack of a cost of living adjustment for Social Security recipients for the second year in a row. In March, Republicans blocked an amendment for a $250 supplemental payment for Social Security recipients.

Edward Coyle, executive director of the Alliance for Retired Americans, says the payment would be a boost to Social Security recipients,

many of whom have seen their retirement savings and home values badly shaken by this economic crisis….The purchasing needs of seniors are unique, and often include medications needed to stay alive.

House Republicans this afternoon led the charge to defeat (254-153) that chamber’s bill calling for the supplemental payment.  The bill was considered under a procedure called suspension of the rules which requires a two-thirds majority necessary to pass.

Missouri Activists Rally for Jobless

     

Cathy Sherwin, AFL-CIO Field Communications staffer  in Missouri, sends us this report from St. Louis on yesterday’s Online Day of Solidarity action for jobless workers.

Jobless workers, union members and community activists stood in the freezing cold on Tuesday in St. Louis, joining activists nationwide for a Dec. 7 Day of Action in solidarity with the unemployed.

They urged Sen. Claire McCaskill (D-Mo.) and the Senate to immediately restore unemployment insurance (UI) for a year for the more than 1 million jobless workers currently without any aid since Senate Republicans blocked action to maintain UI benefits for long-term jobless workers.

Right before leaving for the Thanksgiving holiday, a bill to maintain the unemployment insurance for the long-term jobless was defeated in the House. Missouri Republicans Todd Akin, Roy Blunt, Jo Ann Emerson, Sam Graves and Blaine Luetkemeyer voted to deny this critical lifeline to jobless Missourians.

Yesterday, the White House and congressional Republicans announced a deal to extend all the Bush-era tax cuts, including those for the wealthy, along with a 13-month extension of the UI program for the long-term jobless. But its fate is uncertain. Click here to read AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka’s statement.

Lloyd Schultz, jobless Painters and Allied Trades (IUPAT) member from St. Louis, said:

I can’t wait to go back to work.  Unemployment insurance is the only thing keeping many of us with a roof over our heads and food on the table this winter.

The demonstrators also formed a soup line down along the sidewalk. The Depression-era image of people standing on the streets, in the cold, waiting for a free meal was more than symbolic. If immediate action isn’t taken, millions of jobless workers and their families will literally have no options this winter.

Fifteen million Americans are currently unemployed, with more than 278,000 in Missouri. By the end of December, 2 million people will have lost this critical lifeline unless Congress acts to extend unemployment insurance. Never before has Congress let unemployment benefits expire when this many people have been out of work.

Missouri AFL-CIO President Hugh McVey put it this way:

Time is running out for Congress to take action before massive pain—and even homelessness—hits long-term job-seekers. Our society and our government must not ignore our friends, family and neighbors who are unemployed through no fault of their own.

Study: Half of Seniors at Risk for Poverty

      

Here’s one big reason congressional Republicans and the deficit hawks are dead wrong about cutting Social Security benefits: According to a new study, nearly half (47.4 percent) of all Americans between the ages of 60 and 90 will experience at least one year of poverty or near poverty and seniors of color are twice as likely to be affected.

The study by Mark Rank, a professor of social work at Washington University in St. Louis, shows that 58 percent of seniors between 60 and 84 will, at some point, not have enough liquid assets to allow them to weather an unanticipated expense or downturn in income.

But if you are a senior who is black or unmarried or have less than a high school education, the likelihood that you will be poor at some point increases dramatically. Rank found that although 32.7 percent of white older Americans will experience at least one year below the official poverty line, the percentage for black older Americans was nearly double at 64.6 percent.

For unmarried seniors, the percentage experiencing poverty was 51.2 percent compared with 24.9 percent for married older Americans. Likewise, for those with fewer than 12 years of education, the percentage experiencing poverty was 48.4 percent compared with 20.5 percent for those with 12 or more years of education.

Rep. Barbara Lee (D-Calif.), the Congressional Black Caucus chair, has said:

Safeguarding Social Security is more imperative now than ever. Social Security keeps 20 million Americans out of poverty—many of whom are people of color. As we move into the 112th Congress…we must work together to ensure that Social Security remains intact and solvent for generations to come.

Most American agree. In a new poll, more than eight in 10 likely voters across the political spectrum say they oppose cutting Social Security to reduce the national deficit.

Rank says we can expect greater numbers of seniors will face periods of poverty because Americans are living longer, there are fewer workers in the prime earning years and Americans have not been saving enough for retirement.

He recommends that legislators consider policies that encourage greater levels of savings among the working-age population, facilitating cooperative living arrangements among the elderly and strengthening the Social Security and Supplemental Security Income programs.

You can read Rank’s article, “A Life Course Approach to Understanding Poverty Among Older American Adults,” in the current issue of “Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services” here (subscription required).

DREAMer Gaby Pacheco—So Many Gifts To Share

    Gaby Pacheco         

Gaby Pacheco just wants everyone to know she is as American as anyone else and she has gone to extraordinary lengths to try and prove it. But until Congress passes the DREAM Act, she won’t be able to share her many gifts because people won’t look past the fact that she is undocumented.

The Development, Relief and Education for Alien Minors (DREAM) Act, which is supported by 66 percent of Americans, would allow undocumented students who have lived in the United States for at least five years and have graduated from high school or received a graduate equivalency diploma (GED) to legalize their immigration status by pursuing a college education or serving in the U.S. military. Congress is expected to take up the DREAM Act today.

Take action now. Call your representative at 1-866-967-6018 or your senator at 1-866-996-5161 and tell them something like this:

America needs the DREAM Act now. This bill will allow undocumented youths to earn their legal status through either a college education or military service. Additionally, the DREAM Act strengthens the U.S. economy by cutting the deficit by $1.4 billion.

Pacheco was just seven years old when her family moved here from her native Ecuador and settled in Miami. A gifted child, Pacheco, now 25, had a school career any parent would be proud of. She learned English very quickly and in the first grade, tested in the gifted level for math. She excelled in math, in science, music, ROTC, sports. By the 10th grade, she was taking college-level classes, participating and excelling in three sports and was a ranked officer in Navy ROTC. She says:

            I learned that if I tried hard, I could succeed.

But then reality hit. After she passed all the tests for her driving learner’s permit, she was denied because she was undocumented. Still determined to succeed, she worked even harder in school, taking advance placement courses from 7 a.m. to nearly midnight.

But it still was not enough. An obviously brilliant student—she graduated among the top three in her class—she also contributed 1,000 hours of community service. But she was discouraged from even applying to college because she didn’t have the citizenship paperwork she needed.

Finally, Miami-Dade College admitted her and once again, she excelled. She ran for student body president and completed a bachelor’s degree in special education. But she can’t get a job as a teacher. She wants to put her considerable skills to use teaching and reaching out to students with autism using music therapy.  But no one will hire her because she is undocumented.

 So she keeps fighting. Keeps trying to prove herself.

It’s been a long struggle. I’ve seen many friends just give up and go and work in restaurants and cleaning houses. I’ve seen people be frustrated and go crazy because they don’t know what to do next. I’ve had people come up to me and tell me they don’t have a desire to live any more.

 That’s why we need to pass the DREAM Act, she says.

There’s so much potential and so much desire to serve. More than anything else [there is a need] to be truly recognized as human beings, to be allowed to contribute, to make our lives, pursue our happiness and wake up from this nightmare we’ve been living and live our dreams.

Earlier this year, she walked more than 1,500 miles over four months as part of the “Trail of Dreams.” She and three other undocumented immigrants walked from Miami to Washington, D.C., telling people along the way their stories and asking them to support the DREAM Act. That trip finally gave her hope.

I truly believe that people don’t hate us. They’ve been misled by the media, sometimes even their own families, to believe that we’re bad and that we’re here to get the welfare. Every day on the walk, we talked to people who saw we are just human beings and we were able to regain some of that humanity we’d been searching for.  

Workers at Express Scripts Fight for Jobs, Fair Deal

Although it’s a healthy and profitable company, Express Scripts (ESI), the second largest pharmacy benefit manager in the country, is taking advantage of the tight economy to demand its staff give up wages and benefits.

In contract talks, ESI demanded that the 900 pharmacists and other workers at its processing facilities in Bensalem, Pa., a suburb of Philadelphia, accept cuts totaling $8.8 million in pay and benefits. When the workers, members of SEIU Healthcare PA, rejected the company’s demands, ESI closed one of the plants and announced it was closing another and moving the work elsewhere. If both plants close, some 1,000 workers will be out of jobs just before Christmas.

Workers in other ESI locations, who are represented by AFSCME and the United Food and Commercial Workers (UFCW), are supporting the SEIU members in their fight to save their jobs and gain a fair contract. Ironically, ESI, which posted earnings of $1.7 billion last year, processes prescriptions for numerous union plans and state and local governments, many of which are union.

Members of the St. Louis Workers’ Rights Board, an affiliate of Jobs with Justice, will conduct a hearing this afternoon on allegations of worker abuse by workers employed at ESI’s two Bensalem facilities. The board also will hear testimony from Express Scripts workers from other parts of the country who say they faced intimidation from management while trying to form unions.

The National Labor Relations Board regional director in Philadelphia last week issued a complaint against the company for the plant closing, saying ESI did not bargain in good faith. The two sides will resume negotiations Dec. 8.

In a letter to Express Scripts CEO George Paz, AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka said:

Putting aside the issue of why a profitable company needs to destroy good jobs, I am very troubled over what this means for ESI’s ability to provide for its customers, many of whom receive their benefits through union benefit plans. 

Simply put, this seems like an attempt by your company to use the current economic climate to pressure your employees into accepting significant reductions in compensation.      

You can help by donating to the workers’ Fight Back Fund to ensure they have the money to keep fighting for their jobs and to help support soon-to-be laid-off workers. To donate to the fund, click here, and here for more information on the workers’ struggle.

A new report found that ESI is expanding so rapidly the company may be overvalued, and is so loaded with debt its liquidity may be in danger. The report, “Overdosing on Greed,” says the company’s rapid expansion—its profits have grown 400 percent in the past decade—has caused “significant problems.” According to the report:

Over the past 10 years, a number of health plans and state governments have audited and sued ESI, claiming that the company systematically overcharges its clients, and ESI has paid out millions in settlements. Shareholders sued ESI and its directors, alleging that executive pay packages were inflated at their expense.

Download a copy of the full report here.

Richard Trumka Statement on Tax Cut Deal

AFL-CIO President Richard Trumka today issued the following statement on the tax cut deal reached between President Obama and congressional Republicans:

Two years ago, working Americans had high hopes that we would ultimately emerge from the deep, punishing financial debacle with a sharp focus on a fundamentally stronger, fairer and more balanced economy. Today, that vision has dimmed. 

The tax cut deal rewards Republican obstructionism by giving the wealthy the tax breaks they demanded. It throws away precious resources needed for investments in jobs and our economy on upper income tax cuts that will do very little to propel economic growth—setting up excuses for the deficit hypocrites to argue for even more cuts to programs serving working families. It lards the tax cuts for the top 2 percent with an indefensible cut in the estate tax—giving yet another bonus to the super-rich. Taken together, this package locks in the growing income inequality that has plagued our country for at least another two years—and quite possibly much longer. 

It is unconscionable that the price of support for struggling middle class families and workers who have been unable to find jobs for months and months and months is yet more giveaways for our country’s wealthiest families. Millions of jobless workers have lived in fear for months while Senate Republicans had the gall to use their hardships as political leverage for the benefit of the rich.

The gains for the middle class and jobless workers in the deal come at too high a price. 

The issue we face today is not the lack of power or opportunity. The question we have to answer is this:  How do we use our power to escape caving in to Wall Street and moneyed interests? And how do we create the millions of jobs we need now and move toward a future of broadly shared prosperity?

Syndicate content